首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of serum cystatin C and creatinine changes after cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with normal preoperative kidney function
【2h】

Comparison of serum cystatin C and creatinine changes after cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with normal preoperative kidney function

机译:术前肾功能正常患者体外循环后血清胱抑素C和肌酐变化的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose Serum creatinine is used ubiquitously to estimate glomerular filtration rate and to diagnose acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Serum cystatin C is a novel biomarker that has emerged as a possible diagnostic alternative to serum creatinine. It is unclear if the dynamic changes in serum cystatin C immediately following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) differ from those of serum creatinine in patients with normal preoperative kidney function. Methods We compared changes in serum levels of creatinine and cystatin C by measuring them serially in 19 patients undergoing CPB. Within-patient differences for serum creatinine and serum cystatin C were compared by repeated measures ANOVA. Results Serum creatinine and cystatin C levels showed significant correlation with each other. Both biomarkers showed a significant decrease after CPB, but their serum concentrations reverted to pre-CPB levels within 12 h. Serum levels of serum creatinine remained unchanged from baseline levels throughout 72-h post-CPB. In contrast, serum cystatin C levels rose further and became significantly higher compared to baseline within 48 h. Serum cystatin C remained significantly elevated at 48- and 72-h post-CPB. Conclusions Processes that determine the serum concentrations of serum creatinine and cystatin C in the post-CPB period affect the two biomarkers differently, suggesting that the two are not interchangeable as diagnostic markers of glomerular filtration rate. Future studies are needed to examine if these discrepancies are related to differences in their production rates, in their ability to detect small changes in glomerular filtration rate, or to a combination of these, and to determine the effect of such differences on the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of the two biomarkers.
机译:目的广泛使用血清肌酐来估计肾小球滤过率并诊断心脏手术后的急性肾损伤。血清胱抑素C是一种新型的生物标志物,已成为血清肌酐的一种可能的诊断替代物。尚不清楚术前肾功能正常的患者体外循环(CPB)后血清胱抑素C的动态变化是否与血清肌酐的动态变化不同。方法我们通过连续测量19例接受CPB的患者,比较了血清肌酐和胱抑素C水平的变化。通过重复测量ANOVA比较患者的血清肌酐和血清胱抑素C的差异。结果血清肌酐和半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C水平呈显着相关性。两种生物标志物在CPB后均显示显着下降,但它们的血清浓度在12小时内恢复为CPB之前的水平。在CPB后72小时内,血清肌酐的血清水平与基线水平保持不变。相反,血清半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C水平在48小时之内进一步上升,并显着高于基线。 CPB后48小时和72小时,血清胱抑素C仍显着升高。结论CPB后测定血清肌酐和半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C血清浓度的过程对两种生物标志物的影响不同,表明这两种标志物不能互换作为肾小球滤过率的诊断标志物。需要进行进一步的研究,以检查这些差异是否与生产率的差异,检测肾小球滤过率的细微变化的能力或两者的组合有关,并确定这些差异对诊断和预后的影响两种生物标志物的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号